decoding.  Why is the "Back Nord" show in front of Zemour, Le Pen and Pecriss causing controversy?

decoding. Why is the “Back Nord” show in front of Zemour, Le Pen and Pecriss causing controversy?

On Wednesday, the Alliance Police Union staged a “major oral” allowing presidential candidates to outline their proposals to combat insecurity and delinquency. Only three of them were present at the Club de l’Etoile cinema in Paris (the others were not invited or refused): Marine Le Pen (RN), Eric Zemmour (Reconquête!) and Valérie Pécresse (LR), in addition to the current Minister of the Interior, Gerald Darmanin, About LREM.

On this occasion, the screening of the feature film “Back Nord” by Cedric Jimenez, before speaking only about candidates from the right and the far right, caused people to be confused.

Currently competing in seven categories at Césars, this thriller is inspired by a true story: the case of police officers from “Repo” Pac in Marseille, in which 18 government employees and former employees are accused in 2012 of corruption, racketeering, drug smuggling and personal enrichment. The prosecution resumed the first trial in April 2021 that resulted in seven acquittals and stays of sentences against 11 defendants.

And if the director remembers it as a fiction, then the Alliance Federation considers, for its part, that the film “tells aspects of the daily life of police officers in the northern provinces of Marseille.” Hence the choice of the offer, which was rejected by several cinemas on the pretext of “security reasons,” she said le Figarowhich was not unanimously accepted.

This content has been blocked because you did not accept trackers.

click ” I agree “the trackers will be deposited and you will be able to view the contents .

click “I accept all tracers”You authorize the deposit of trackers to store your data on our websites and apps for the purposes of personalization and ad targeting.

You reserve the option to withdraw your consent at any time.
Manage my choices


The manager says he wasn’t warned

Asked Huffington PostDirector Cedric Jimenez initially said he had not been contacted or warned prior to the event, saying he would prefer not to respond to what he saw as an “unfortunate political recovery”.

A little later in the day, he added to France Inter: “They didn’t ask me, I didn’t know. I found out very late, last weekend. I know they asked the producer about the trailer, which we refused. […] We can’t do anything. It’s annoying, it bothers me a lot, because the film remains a cinematic work and cannot become a political target.”

“It doesn’t happen every day. It doesn’t represent the daily life of the neighborhoods nor the life of the police. They don’t do operations like this every day, every week, that’s wrong, so it’s a movie, a fantasy, focused on a legal issue,” the director explained again. .

Really political movie…

However, many presidential candidates have already cited “Back Nord” in the past to illustrate their rhetoric. These are again prominent political figures on the right. On January 18, it was Valerie Pecresse who spoke on BFMTV, as the Huffington Post noted: “We’re talking about Republican reoccupations of neighborhoods that have been severely undermined by violence, I advise you to go see Back Nord you understand what I mean.”

“I don’t know if you’ve seen the movie Back Nord,” Eric Zemmour said on BFMTV during a debate against Jean-Luc Mélenchon (LFI). “You see the reality of police today in cities.” In October, Marine Le Pen, on Twitter, noted that The film to express its dissatisfaction with the targeting of Bac de Marseille police officers by Kalashnikov fire: “And some insist on saying that the Bac Nord film does not reflect any reality,” she wrote.

This content has been blocked because you did not accept trackers.

click ” I agree “the trackers will be deposited and you will be able to view the contents .

click “I accept all tracers”You authorize the deposit of trackers to store your data on our websites and apps for the purposes of personalization and ad targeting.

You reserve the option to withdraw your consent at any time.
Manage my choices


asked by Paris In October, the director already denounced this use of his work: “The political recovery is unfortunate and, unfortunately, we suffer from it. Zemour and Le Pen distort the theme of the film, making unfortunate shortcuts.” He also defended himself from any situation to the right of his film: “I don’t vote for the right, my mother worked all her life at CAF, and we don’t do more on the left…but journalists have the right to see the things I don’t want to convey.”

Warnings issued

Indeed, once the film was shown to the press, and after it was shown in theaters, voices rose to denounce or at least question the view chosen by the director, in this case the opinion of the three policemen, and the political recovery that would result in a presidential election in less than a year.

At Cannes in July, Irish journalist from AFP, Viacra Gibbons, commented at a press conference: “We’re in an election year. I saw it with the eyes of a foreigner and said to myself: Maybe I’ll vote for Le Pen then. Because people are at a loss. […] The people of the lost are really only animals.” A comment that at that time caused nervous laughter within the film team.

This content has been blocked because you did not accept trackers.

click ” I agree “the trackers will be deposited and you will be able to view the contents .

click “I accept all tracers”You authorize the deposit of trackers to store your data on our websites and apps for the purposes of personalization and ad targeting.

You reserve the option to withdraw your consent at any time.
Manage my choices


“I hope Marine Le Pen doesn’t pass thanks to me, that would upset me […] I don’t think the film exists to denounce the areas of lawlessness and to provoke outrage, on the contrary,” Cedric Jimenez responded at the time.

As soon as “Back Nord” was released, critics Telerama However, she followed the same path as AFP: “The description of the police hierarchy getting married which made him by the police in command […] The representation of the population of working-class neighbourhoods also passes through the gaze of the three police officers. We rarely distinguish their faces, like a horde of monsters without individuality. As the issue on which the film is based is still ongoing, the magazine also noted that “there remains a legitimate fear of the novel’s impact on public opinion.”

“All that’s left for us is to make a family comedy”

Meanwhile, Marsacto, noted: “On the one hand, the reliance on reality allows the film to exploit all the fantasies associated with the northern provinces and the crime-fighting brigade, a first in France by its workforce. On the other hand, the alienation of reality, and thus of judicial truth, cuts the stakes of this unusual case.” The site noted the many differences with the story from which the feature film was inspired, and noted that “these freedoms of screenwriting prove problematic in light of the reality of the file.” which is still being implemented.

“If there is a political revival every time the subject of the film touches something political, that means we just have to do a family comedy.[…] It’s worrisome in general, and not just for me. If we make films, it is good because we choose not to engage in politics,” he said on Wednesday at France’s Inter Cedric Jimenez. That his film may already have transcended.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.