On Tinder, the less beautiful you are, the less likely you are to meet a beautiful person

On Tinder, the less beautiful you are, the less likely you are to meet a beautiful person

Sex – Singleness and dating apps have a long history. For some, it is useless. For others, it’s the “match,” as in Tinder. what is wrong? A powerful algorithm leads us to constantly communicate to meet people who are similar to us.

Journalist Judith Duportel revealed this in her 2019 book Love under the algorithm, a survey of a dating app with 61 million users published by Éditions Goutte d’Or and edited, Wednesday, January 19, in a France 2 documentary in the second part of the evening.

Among the gears of the system, the author noticeably highlighted the dark history of user ratings. This rating is now known as the “Approval Score”, also called the “Elo Score”.

It’s by falling for a newspaper article in the American magazine fast company Which I first heard about by Judith Duportel. Its author, Austin Carr, described a surprising discussion in which Tinder founder, Sean Rad, boasted of creating a rating system for men and women in the app.

well-established recording system

For that user, it’s falling from the clouds. She recalls in her book “The Elo Score is a rating assigned to each individual based on his past performance in an area. For example, a football player gets points when he scores goals or wins matches. But since it is more difficult to beat Bayern Munich than against Guigamp , every match won does not equal the same number of points.

She continues: “So you have to understand that every time your profile is presented to someone, a mini-tournament is played, such as a football match or a game of chess. […] If the person “against you” has a high degree of liking you, you earn points. If she has a low rating and ignores you…. you will lose some.”

The problem is that we can’t tell which one is worth what. The rules of the game do not provide for this. Does the evaluation of a profile simply depend on the user’s architecture? Sure, but not only. “It’s not just a measure of beauty,” says Sean Rad. fast company. What then?

Judith Duportel dug. I came across 27 pages of the patent owned by Tinder. The famous “Elo Score” is not only based on our attractiveness, but is also calculated according to our income level, education level, intelligence or even our IQ by analyzing, for example, grammar, vocabulary or the length of our answers on the application.

Nothing is left to chance

Geolocation also comes into play and thus allows Tinder to arrange its users into “pools,” i.e. groups of individuals created according to their rating and the distance between them.

Technology The company has done its best to keep it confidential. “Our ‘matching’ servers are at the core of our technology and intellectual property and we cannot share information about our deposited tools,” one caller told the investigator.

But now, a few days before the publication of Judith Duportel’s book, Tinder has retreated. The app went back to its notes by detailing its software a bit more, showing that the Elo score is already there, but it’s no longer in use. Has the secret Tinder recipe evolved since then? The app is discreet, but clearly nothing is left to chance, especially meetings.

See also on HuffPost: This German animal shelter uses Tinder for a good reason

.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.